Connected Health: It’s Going To Happen
This is a short blog post on the way home from Connected Health 2009. I’m in the air on Virgin Atlantic typing on my iPhone connected to the web with inflight WiFi — that’s why it’s short and may have some typos.
First of all, Connected Health is a much bigger idea than the original idea of telemedicine, which was all about laying the painful last mile of technology to finally reach those with the greatest needs to communicate about health.
Connected Health, in contrast, is not about devices, sensors and gadgets. It is about the idea that how people connect with each other has a profound impact on health.
As Nicholas Christakis, author of “Connected”, reiterated in his keynote speech, our connections to each other, probably even more so that our connections to our doctors and nurses, has a measurable impact on our health.
Despite the big idea of connected health, too many of the Connected Health sessions followed the same format:
1. Most of the trillions in health spending is the result of chronic illness which in turn is the consequence of our lifestyle and behavior.
2. There is compelling evidence that connected health can improve quality and reduce the cost of care, referring to proactive care models that coach and monitor patients at home.
3. The only barrier to widespread adoption of a more rational model of connected care that will save our health system from impending collapse is Medicare coverage of remote health monitoring technologies.
This is the same conversation we had six years ago when we introduced the first connected health ideas as part of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. Six years later, it seemed like nothing had changed.
In fact, much has changed, and the next few years will be profoundly different than the past six. The fact is, we are all becoming connected in a tighter web of relationships enabled by technology. 300 million of us are on Facebook, maintaining a constant awareness of how our social network is faring. Soon we all will be able to keep tabs on our most important relationships on our smartphones.
When Grandma is also on Facebook, and her friends and family know how she is doing and she knows they still care, do you think there will be fewer crises that lead to hospitalization? I think so.
In a world where we can blog and tweet from an airplane while watching satellite TV, we surely have the tools to create the kind of connection that will improve healthcare. It’s going to happen, not because of policies and reimbursement, but simply because connected health is far better for everyone than isolation.
You are right on, Steve!
Dwelling a moment on your comment about grandma. . . I can only think of two people in my life that are not part of the web in one way or another. Those two are my in-laws who are in their later 80′s.
Even my 5 years olds have limited internet exposure sitting on my lap, hunting and pecking!
Telemedicine is and will continue have a major impact in improving healthcare because it is now no longer viewed as smoke-&-mirrors or vaporware!
Health education starting at an early age, my opinion, would have another large impact on improving our overall national (maybe global) health dilema, if it can be done.
Thanks for you post and God bless.
Comment by Poly Endrasik Jr — October 24, 2009 @ 5:55 am
Excellent post on what the meaning is of connected health in the larger sphere and the tight web of connections that technology enables us to have. In 2007 basic in-home sensor technology for remote monitoring (telecare) moved demonstrably in the public perception from experimental to established/adopted. That standalone is now being supplanted/subsumed into other technologies. The same can be said for health management and PHRs–more connected, does more, lighter, simpler.
I’d like to link to your post on Telecare Aware–please advise if this is OK with you w/reply to above note.
Comment by Donna Cusano — October 29, 2009 @ 8:33 am
I’ve sat at the table to discuss topics like this and it is interesting to hear what people know will work to what is actually used today. I understand that these large Medicare companies will suffer greatly but the survival of these businesses should not be at the cost of lives that could be saved through connected health. I’ve done a little bit of solution dreaming myself and I think that a MEDCOM or medical communications network would which clones the way the military connects amongst each other.
This will all take time to come into reality but it’s worth throwing out there. Kudos for the article. Thank you.
Comment by Patricio Quezada — December 16, 2009 @ 4:07 pm